<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
			
			<rss version="2.0">
			<channel>
			<title>Melrose Solutions Blog - SES URLs</title>
			<link>http://melrosesolutions.com/blog/index.cfm</link>
			<description>This is the Melrose Solutions blog.</description>
			<language>en-gb</language>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:14:42 +0100</pubDate>
			<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:08:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<generator>BlogCFC</generator>
			<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
			<managingEditor>gareth.cole@melrosesolutions.com</managingEditor>
			<webMaster>gareth.cole@melrosesolutions.com</webMaster>
			
			
			
			
			
			<item>
				<title>Are SES URLs evil?</title>
				<link>http://melrosesolutions.com/blog/index.cfm/2009/8/6/Are-SES-URLs-evil</link>
				<description>
				
				&lt;p&gt;I was reading a recent article in .NET magazine about optimising Flash sites for Google. When I got to the box on &lt;em&gt;Friendly URLs&lt;/em&gt;, I thought it ironic that they were perpetuating another web design myth. After all, their recent June issue had been dedicated to myth busting, and SES URLs are the biggest myth out there?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Checking back however, I realised that even .NET magazine are still taken in &amp;hellip;&lt;/p&gt;
				 [More]
				</description>
						
				
				<category>SES URLs</category>				
				
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:08:00 +0100</pubDate>
				<guid>http://melrosesolutions.com/blog/index.cfm/2009/8/6/Are-SES-URLs-evil</guid>
				
			</item>
			
		 	
			</channel></rss>